Frequently Asked Questions
- Where can I find the recorded version of the webinar?
- I have videos and hyperlinks I would like to share with my submission. Is that allowed?
- Are you only looking for research ideas? Do you want to hear from non-researchers?
- When you think about “dramatic” improvements, do you see that as necessarily being driven by a breakthrough technology, or might an evidence-based pedagogical innovation (that may include non-breakthrough technology) that causes significant learning outcomes be of equal interest?
- Are you interested in early childhood (Pre-K) strategies as well as K-12?
- You say you are also looking at technology. Does this include games, VR, AR, chatbots, biosensors etc.
- I’m a teacher and have a great idea. Can I respond to this RFI?
- We don’t work in education, but our solution could be used to improve education products. Do you want to hear from us?
- We are a for profit company. Should we submit?
- What is executive function?
- What grade levels are you targeting?
- Is this a request for proposals or applications?
- May I submit multiple entries for the same program area?
- Are submissions welcome from outside the United States? Are these program areas restricted to ideas that would only impact students in the United States?
- I’m not currently affiliated with a company or research organization. How should I list my affiliation for this proposal?
- When is the Request for Information (RFI) due?
- Can I start my RFI and come back to work on it?
- Can I respond to the RFI with collaborating organizations/individuals?
- Is a female-owned or led organization considered a minority-owned or led organization?
- Can I respond to more than one program area?
- Does my submission have to address the entire program area?
- What if my idea to address one of these program areas deviates from the RFI?
- What length of responses are you expecting?
- Can I include any graphics or visuals to support my RFI submission?
- Who will be reviewing the RFI responses?
- Will what I submit be kept confidential?
- Will I receive feedback on my submission?
- Do I need to respond to the RFI to qualify for any potential future funding related to these topics?
- What is Pasteur’s Quadrant and how does it apply here?
- How are you addressing FERPA and data privacy protections?
- Should we include practitioners in our discussions?
Given the volume of RFI submissions, we can only evaluate submissions in the written format we requested and are unable to review submissions where the abstracts and other written content are solely hyperlinks or videos. However, we welcome your inclusion of hyperlinks that provide examples of your work in the body of a written submission. We also provide the option for you to upload two graphics as part of your response.
We are looking for good ideas from across the entire spectrum and welcome non-research ideas. Our goal is to create solutions that create dramatic improvements over current practice. We highly encourage non-researchers, including those who do not currently work in the education sector, to submit your ideas.
When you think about “dramatic” improvements, do you see that as necessarily being driven by a breakthrough technology, or might an evidence-based pedagogical innovation (that may include non-breakthrough technology) that causes significant learning outcomes be of equal interest?
We are agnostic as to the blend of technology and non-technology approaches. Individual pieces of the solution may not be breakthrough innovations themselves, but lead to dramatic improvements when combined with other approaches.
Yes, again we are not limiting the ideas being submitted. Send us your best ideas, even if they are not standalone solutions.
Yes, we highly encourage educators to respond. We believe that successful solutions will only be created by including ideas from those who work directly with students.
Yes, we are looking for innovative ideas from both inside and outside the education industry.
Yes, we welcome submissions from for-profit entities. We ask that you please do not submit proprietary information for this RFI, but we seek your help in identifying both state-of-the-art and state-of-the-possible in these program areas.
Executive function skills are the cognitive processes that enable us to plan, focus attention, remember instructions, and juggle multiple tasks successfully. Just as an air traffic control system safely manages the arrivals and departures of many aircraft on multiple runways, the brain needs this skill set to plan and manage thoughts. Executive Function allows people to think critically, give considered responses rather than impulsive ones, resist temptations, resist distractions, and stay focused.
For all three program areas, we welcome responses with ideas or solutions focused anywhere from early childhood through the transition to post-secondary education.
No, this is not a request for proposals or applications for funding. This is a request for information for promising approaches in math, writing and executive function. This is not a funding announcement — it will help us understand how to support future work.
Yes, you may submit multiple entries either individually or in collaboration with others. While we encourage you to consolidate related ideas/projects into a single submission, if you feel that your ideas/projects warrant separate submissions, you are welcome to do so. Please note that if your subsequent submissions have different collaborators from those in your original profile, you will need to complete your first submission before you can update your profile to start your next submission.
We welcome submission of innovative ideas from anywhere in the world.
Please list your most relevant current affiliation. You may list “self” if you are not currently affiliated with any entity. We encourage responses from individuals, groups, or collaborations both inside and outside the education community, including but not limited to practitioners, universities, university-affiliated research centers, not-for-profit research institutions, professional development organizations, government-sponsored labs, and public and private companies.
Can I respond to the RFI with collaborating organizations/individuals?
Yes, up to four organizations/individuals may respond to the RFI together. We will ask you to list and provide demographic and contact information for each collaborating organization/individual.
Is a female-owned or led organization considered a minority-owned or led organization?
We are using the federal/Small Business Administration definition, which lists female-led organizations as a separate category from minority-led organizations. We are not collecting data on the gender of the applicant organization’s leadership at this stage.
Does my submission have to address the entire program area?
No, responses only need to address components critical for the overall success of the program area’s goals. However, we welcome comprehensive submissions.
What if my idea to address one of these program areas deviates from the RFI?
The program area descriptions in the RFI are only a general guide. You are welcome to present new ideas and perspectives that are not covered in the RFI language, but are critical for the success of the program goals.
What length of responses are you expecting?
There are five major questions in the RFI for which we have provided word limits. The total word limit per program area you are responding to is equivalent to approximately four pages of text.
Can I include any graphics or visuals to support my RFI submission?
If you have a graphic or other visual representation you would like to submit to support your project idea, you may submit a single attachment that is no more than two pages per response.
Who will be reviewing the RFI responses?
Staff from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) and the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative (CZI). We are also planning to engage external experts including educators, administrators, researchers, and developers for their opinions and advice.
Will what I submit be kept confidential?
Submissions may be shared rapidly with outside experts. We ask that you do NOT submit confidential information, since it will not remain so through this RFI process. Ultimately, any projects or grants that may emerge later will incorporate ways to preserve Intellectual Property – any such ideas at this stage should be submitted in a form that does not yet require confidentiality or protection. We plan to share aggregated and anonymized learnings from the RFI with the respondents and the ﬁeld to further inform future program development. Knowing that RFIs often lead to many great ideas that any entity is unable to support on its own, we also intend to share RFI responses with other funders.
What is Pasteur’s Quadrant and how does it apply here?
Instead of thinking about research as being either basic or applied, Pasteur’s Quadrant is an alternative that collapses the distinction by conducting basic research towards a specific and applied goal. The result is a program that progresses to the ultimate solution by answering key questions along the way. Programs managed within Pasteur’s Quadrant are typically flexible and change as new things are learned during development.
How are you addressing FERPA and data privacy protections?
A critical part of this RFI is to identify privacy and ethical issues associated with these topics. Simply complying with the law is the baseline – and we intend to go above and beyond to protect and ensure privacy. We ask that you do not submit any personally identifiable information.
We consider all laws and regulations to be a baseline for action, and will expect any partners or applicants to go above and beyond to ensure that privacy will be protected. Strict adherence to education data laws will foster trust and collaboration among intermediaries and their schools, districts, or other relevant parties.
For more information on our data principles view the Bill & Melinda Gates Data Stewardship Principles and the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Education Privacy Principles.
Should we include practitioners in our discussions?
We highly encourage coordination with practitioners for this RFI although it is not a requirement. We believe successful solutions require the inclusion of educators, students, and parents, not just researchers and developers. We believe including practitioners is key to understanding what will work successfully in the classroom.